Read Note 2
Published:
Citation
Peters, Ole, and Alexander Adamou. “The Ergodicity Solution of the Cooperation Puzzle.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 380, no. 2227 (July 11, 2022): 20200425. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0425.
Abstract
The author uses the concept of ergodicity to show that cooperation can increase the time-average growth rate of resources, providing an evolutionary advantage.
Past Models
classical treatments works where direct and immediate benefits are created
- complementarity in the shared resources
- differences in resource types
- complementarity in the shared resources
- a resource threshold
- the whole is deterministically ‘more than the sum of its parts’
- a resource threshold
noisy multiplicative growth model
Cooperation protocol in GBM model
geometric Brownian motion (GBM) model
- a complex model of unconstrained self-reproduction
cooperation protocol
- Cooperation has no direct cost and benefit in this protocol
effects of cooperation protocol
- the resources of each member of a cooperating pair grow faster than the resources of the corresponding non-cooperators
- they also grow faster than the average resources of the non-cooperators, showing that cooperation and averaging are not equivalent operations
- the resources of each member of a cooperating pair grow faster than the resources of the corresponding non-cooperators
- the volatility reduction achieved by the cooperators leads to faster growth
- the time-average growth rate of resources is reduced by fluctuations
- cooperation is enhanced by diversity in individual outcomes
- the volatility reduction achieved by the cooperators leads to faster growth
- larger cooperatives are favoured over smaller ones
- as the cooperative expands, the benefit gained by adding each new member diminishes
- larger cooperatives are favoured over smaller ones
two major implications of the theoretical finding
- a candidate explanation for observed cooperation in real
- aslo can explain simple setting such as from single cell to cell pair
- a candidate explanation for observed cooperation in real
- a leading-order result from which deviations can be studied
- cooperation should be considered the norm while the absence of cooperation requires special explanations
- rethink of definitions of self-interest
- a leading-order result from which deviations can be studied
result
- cooperation is attractive when resources are selfreproductive
Other Considerations
- whether group and individual interests could become misaligned in the model
- entities pool and share resources only with those to whom they are connected
- risk management (by reducing fluctuation) has a rarely recognized significance
Concepts
Growth Rates
Two fundamental growth rates are identified: the ensemble-average growth rate and the time-average growth rate, with the latter being influenced by the degree of cooperation
time-average growth rates
the average rate of growth that an individual entity
ensemble-average growth rates
the average growth rate across a large group or ensemble of entities
Ergodicity
A statistical property where the time average of a process equals the ensemble average the essence of the ergodicity debate >features emerging from fluctuations when averaging over a statistical ensemble do not, in general, also emerge in individual systems over time
Non-ergodicity
the difference (time<ensemble) between the ensemble-average growth rate and the time-average growth rate due to the correlated fluctuations
correlated fluctuations
entities experiencing consistently similar or dissimilar conditions
How this may affect the research field of overtourism
the background of overtourism
- from the micro level, it is the result of a time-space imbalance in growth of tourists
- from the macro level, it can be linked to the risk with globalization, in particular the accelerated movement of people and resources
- In contrast, the reduction in travel by people during the Covid-19 epidemic can be seen as the opposite extreme of overtourism (both of them are excessive volatility)
the connection between the model and overtourism
- overtourism often leads to the overdevelopment of resources and environmental stress, which is similar to how fluctuations impact resource growth in the model
- there are also entities (residents, tourists, govement, company…) who can choose whether to cooperate with other
- in case of overtourism, conflicts are more often since some entities think the devolop of destination will undermines their profits
how stakeholders can benefit from cooperation in overtourism
- cooperation among various stakeholders is necessary in managing the number of tourists and optimizing the distribution of tourism resources
- reducing volatility for long-term growth gives thought on measures to mitigate over-tourism
- promoting alternative destinations
- dispersaling the active area of tourists and residents
- investing in infrastructure that can handle tourist influx
- improve relationship between residents and tourists
summary
Using the ergodicity solution of the cooperation puzzle for risk management in tourism promotes sustainable industry development, and also protects the interests of individual tourists and local communities.
